“there is always something underneath –
how much space is there in your head?
how much of that space are you willing to fill?
– more than expected”
— The self and the words
Essays in ‘The self and the words’
“The Self Is”
by Sarah Axt
The self is:
compassionate, connected, calm, creative, clear, curious, confident, courageous
A combination of adjectives that sound like wishful thinking more than anything. Doesn’t require a name, just requires a system; established at birth and highly invisible. Functional or dysfunctional? We are all made of parts. Uncountable. Parts that work together, are angry
embarrassedprotectivejealousscareddefensive.
Comfortable, toxic friends. Wounded parts. Exiles.
People are the same. They stumble over their feet and laugh nervously. Who observed the clumsiest moment of their day. Laugh with me. They stand in line for the post office the week before Christmas to send last-minute paper hugs. Love, John. They barely look up when they walk – the sky turns apricot and softly says goodnight to the sun – and finally they stop and stare in astonishment. I must capture this.
We feel so far, despite our similarly complex systems. All lost, in search of ourselves. Our selfs. One another? Webs of circumstance and chance. We think all that surrounds us makes up our identity, that all we do is who we are. Our parts know who we’ve been and had to be; how we hid under the duvet, hoping the screaming would stop. They live as though we are still eight, scared of our father. Our self isn’t fearful and isn’t ever lost. A mind is a map, and some parts are dead ends. The self, yourself, bends roads, uncovers what needs to be turned.
A friend of mine changed her name recently. She told me that she hesitated for a moment when posting the form through the letterbox. Is this really what I want?
Untangling a system of life-long conditioning will feel like loss at first. Though with time, you will find that “‘finding yourself’ is not really how it works. You aren’t a ten-dollar bill in last winter’s coat pocket. You are also not lost. Your true self is right there, buried under cultural conditioning, other people’s opinions, and inaccurate conclusions you drew as a kid that became your beliefs about who you are. ‘Finding yourself’ is actually returning to yourself. An unlearning, an excavation, a remembering who you were before the world got its hands on you.”1
Strip from all that has been put on you. You are your childhood bedroom walls, covered by layers upon layers of wallpaper. Change: change your hair, your name, your tastes. Change until you’re sick of change too, and then change once again. Until olives are your favourite snack and not most hated finger-food. Until change, in all its glory, becomes constant and comfortable. Change your mind and challenge your system; maybe just because you can.
At times, we blend into the parts we have tried to escape from. Our system may want to run, try its hardest to avoid being opened like a can of worms. But your self, yes, your self will celebrate the triumph of not shying away. It is unnerving to be fully known by another, or yourself. “When my beloved calls my name—in the bathtub, in her bed, over the telephone, into a microphone or my ear—it closes my eyes, buckles me, thralls my insides with the sweet terror of being recognized. Sometimes, we cannot bear the thing we crave.”2 Welcome fear most of all. If you can find comfort in unravelling, you can find comfort unlike ever before.
Emily McDowell, ‘Finding Yourself Card,’ Em&Friends. Available at: <https://emandfriends.com/products/finding-yourself-card> [accessed 28 November 2022]
Melissa Febos, ‘Call My Name’ in Prairie Schooner (2014), issue 88, no. 1, pp. 9-16, p. 16. Available at: <http://www.jstor.org/stable/24639947> [accessed 25 October 2022]
“I”
by Callum Gavin
When I write, I am someone who thinks about thinking (about the lives of others); I am storyteller rather than chronicler of self. I think about dismantling self into shards, then reassembling it. Not as in kintsugi where the pieces go back where they were, and the cracks and fissures trace a line through history. No, the finished piece has cracks that shift and jump, the tiniest shards are tenderly glued together while the larger ones may be cast aside, leaving the line of history without origin or terminus. No pattern.
It is still me in the story.
It could not be anyone else.
Fractured ‘me,’ distorted and obscured by my design.
I think of the mirror phase as a beginning, an act of self-alienation, a process of turning self into an object to be studied, dissected and othered, I see a carnivalesque hall of mirrors in which self, myself, is reproduced infinitely.3 What if this incessant reproduction of self causes one to lose sight of original self, and corrupts its aura? Walter Benjamin thought that this was the case with mechanical reproduction: the more a piece of art is copied – identical prints of paintings, or reel after reel of the same film – the more the uniqueness, the truth of the piece is diminished.4 There are (perhaps apocryphal) stories of cultures in which a belief that gazing into a mirror as it shatters affects you, possibly even takes a part of your soul; there are others in which having your photograph taken is feared to have the same effect. Living as I do, in one of the most heavily surveilled, social media obsessed countries in the world, I certainly hope not. I want to see more than reflections and hear more than echoes; to dream of more than flowers of yellow and white craning towards themselves in a murky riverbed eternally.5
When little, before a mirror was anything but a mirror, I had a curfew. One time I stayed out past curfew. Curfew sounds too American, but I don’t remember what I called it. I left my friend and walked no more than forty feet to my front door. I didn’t know life looked different alone at night, and darkness felt far more like a presence than an absence. Buildings taller, shadows sharper, wind louder, and silence louder still; windows were on fire, crooked trees reached out to grab, what felt like a guarantee yesterday was slipping away from me. I dissolved into the world, a lonely, solitary figure painted onto a landscape, fully absorbed by night. I seek that sense I had on the longest short walk home; I want to learn things about who we are in the dark.
As I wrote the paragraph above, my fingers stopped moving mid-sentence and my mind matched that pace. Had I conveyed what I wanted? Was the personal coherent with the allusions to the work of others? What am I having for dinner? Do my upstairs neighbours have to make as much noise as rhinos on rollerblades? I note the time and collect my thoughts; deadlines don’t accommodate navel-gazing. My laptop has gone to sleep, words I filled the page with replaced with the eerie, dark mirror image of a dead screen absorbing me. I wonder what this means. Nothing, probably.
Jane Gallop, ‘Lacan’s “Mirror Stage”: Where To Begin’ in SubStance, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 118-128. Available at: <https://doi.org/10.2307/3684185>
Walter Benjamin, The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction (London: Penguin, 2008)
Ovid, Metamorphoses (London: Penguin Classics, 2004)
“demythology”
by Teddy Rose
My older sister was named for my great-grandmother. My younger sibling’s name was pulled from thin air. I was named after my mother’s favourite character in a book written over a century ago. I suppose that’s the heart of it.
Gertrude Stein said, “call anybody Paul and they get to be Paul call anybody Alice and they get to be Alice perhaps yes perhaps no.”1 Denise Riley wrote, “my name is sheer ‘extimacy.’ And it’s something that I pull inside me to make it mine.”2 Give anybody a name and they will make that name who they are –
INTERLUDE
It goes like this: every Ella I’ve ever met has been polite and well-spoken and smiled like sunshine and smelt like sugar cookies; every Emma I’ve met has had a sour turn of lip, a tendency towards mean words and actions. Every Ben I know is soft inside and out, hard-shell hard-won; every Craig reminds me of eroding cliff edge. All tried so hard to be good. I have never met another Teddy; I will be my first.
– does the name make the person or does the person make the name? Sometimes, I only understand someone by their name – Ryan, Caitlin, or Eden – because no other name work. Effortless embodiment of name. Conversely, sometimes a face can fit a thousand names; I know a Kate who could be Freya, or Sam. And while, yes, a rose by any other name might not smell as sweet and, yes, the name a parent gives to a child is a life-long wound, we keep going. We keep forming ourselves around these words, these ways of understanding.
Somewhere, a realisation: my whole personality will be pockmarked by the fact I am called Moira. Children turn their noses up at Maude in the playground, whose name stitches her to hand-hemmed aprons. Names carry connotations as much as any other word. But aren’t we made up of the things we aren’t, too? The things we almost were? Maybe Maude was almost Rebecca – how different a life as Rebecca would be. Maybe Moira was almost Grace – oh, to live with the harmony of the name that is Grace.
When I am born, I am nearly a Jo Meg, after the eldest March sisters in Little Women. Imagine the horror, the playground tragedy; a not-quite-girl with a name made for climbing trees and ripping open trouser knees, middle name ripe for cracking open and scooping the innards out of. A laughingstock. And while Jo’s fierce passion will always be admirable, and Meg's loyalty to family lovable, I would not have been me. I would have been someone else entirely as Jo Meg. I believe wholeheartedly that this ‘almost’ curls concave to my actuality, holds reality snug to its imagined belly. I am not a Jo Meg, because I was Beth Amy instead. The family darling and the family death. (When I am young and I read the book for the first time, I extrapolate two things from my namesakes: that I am destined to be a snotty brat, and that I am destined to die young. Both things very nearly happen.) I become the homeliest of three children, the quietest, the one most like my Marmee; I become a painter, a poet. I am shaped by the book with my almost- and actual- names before I even hold the pages in my hands.
The first book I remember being mine – really, truly mine, down to the bone – was given to me by a man who thought he was Jesus, reincarnated. In my mind’s eye, the outstretched hand bearing the present appears from above like the arm of God, tanned wrist peeking out of pearlescent clouds.
The cover of the book is fashioned after the film adaption. A girl dressed in blue, curls of hair like copper coins, stepping through a golden door. In my memory, I snatch at the novel – I am entranced. I am still telling myself (at this point) that I am a girl and that liking girls is okay if it’s only for their looks and that if I pray hard enough God will let it all slide.
The book is called The Little White Horse. It promises adventure and intrigue – it delivers. It hangs in the balance somewhere between magic realism and religious symbolism. The main character is called Maria – as in Mary, the virgin – the Immaculate Mother. She is bold
and
red-headed
and
saving the world
and
her faith is astounding. I find comfort in descriptions of carved pews and cursed places. I find comfort in their faith in goodness.
I haven’t picked up that book since I was thirteen, but the spine is cracked and broken enough you’d think it had saved my life.
I chose my name at eighteen. I did not whisper it aloud until I was twenty-one. I did not beg the people I love to refer to me by the name I felt was mine. I was afraid they would not love me the same. Because it was not the name I was given when I crawled out of the womb screaming, not the name everybody else saw, the sticky label on my jumper when I first went to school. It was my name which had lingered, simmering, in the pit of my stomach since childhood, my name, indecipherable until I learnt the language. How could I ask people to call me that which was not my name without seeking attention?
INTERLUDE II
I am a writer who wants to learn how to interrogate their own thinking. Why do I think the way I do? Why am I the person that I am? I am a tangle of DNA. A constellation of thought and feeling and language stolen from others.
Melissa Febos talks about her connection to her own name in Girlhood – the soft ribbon of the ‘s,’ the refreshing gasp of the ‘a.’ She said she would never be done with Melissa; at odds, I think I am done with Beth – the rounded opening sound, the hissing conclusion – but it will never be done with me. That sticky label went through the wash with the jumper, turned tacky and dark with the wool. I can cover it with a new label – the label I feel is more mine – but it will always linger in the stitches of this sweater. Out with the sweater and out with the name, though, yes?
Oh, no.
We’re not quite there yet.
Gertrude Stein, Lectures in America (New York: Random House, 1935), p. 210
Denise Riley, “Your Name Which Isn’t Yours” in Impersonal Passion: Language as Affect, (North Carolina: Duke University Press, 2005), p. 115
“my dog knows a thing or two”
by Jeannie MacLean
Throw a stone into a still pool and the ripples spread outward. They don’t break. They follow one another until they disappear into stillness.
There are people who could explain the physics of this, but I’m not sure I want to understand.
The action of the stone entering the water and disappearing, leaving an impact of its passing through, is wonder enough.
The desire to write begins with the stirring of an idea. It’s not an itch that needs to be scratched – less superficial than that. It seems like an internal movement allowing the senses to come into play, an upsurge in the desire to create.
The river is darkening in autumn. Recent heavy rain has given way to a more benign flow. My dog sniffs the air and sets about exploring the undergrowth.
Despite the warmth, clouds are rising over the high hills at the head of the Glen. It’s raining there, and it’s heading this way. When I next glance northwards, the clouds have risen so high there is no further precipitation. They pass over, leaving the smirr of rain spread among the high hills, darkening the sky over my head momentarily before the sun breaks through again.
The dog appears with a dead rabbit in her mouth. The state of rigor mortis would suggest it hasn’t been alive for a while, and the gift is deposited at my feet with great generosity of spirit.
Her Labrador retriever genes are to the fore – she has not been trained to retrieve, nor to swim, but her urge to immerse herself in river water and move powerfully against the current is an echo of the place of her origins, made manifest in the webs between the pads of her paws. She is designed for swimming and programmed for bringing gifts for me.
I rub her velvet ears in thanks.
We both love summer swimming in deep river pools. She swims faster than I, but turns to check on my non-webbed progress as we cross the river. While she polices the bank for rabbits, I watch beneath branches of an alder; small fish surfacing, jumping, creating flashes; droplets of water catching rays of lowering light.
My skill at shaking myself dry after a swim is lacking too. I watch the spirals of water being flung from her dark fur as she shakes her body from head to tail, accompanied by a slapping sound as she seems to loosen her skin from her skeleton. I see her muscles twitching along the length of her body until the final drops are released from her tail.
Besides swimming, her other love is a yellow tennis ball. She will carry it in her mouth mile after mile, then come and drop it at my feet in a request to launch it into the air for her to catch. We go through this ritual regularly. She has perfected the art of outrunning the ball. If the ground is hard, she waits for the ball to bounce and then leaps towards it. There is a moment when everything appears to stop – the ball, the dog, the world itself. Just a moment where everything becomes aligned. The ball is neatly caught in her waiting jaws and movement restarts. She becomes a vortex of happiness as she races round in a circle to celebrate another successful catch. I have seen it more than once, that moment. The space between the falling ball and her open mouth. The accuracy with which she has aligned herself, and the suspension of time. Just a tiny moment, but such an important one; the moment of waiting for the right thing to happen. I want to inhabit that moment. It seems alive with possibility.
Mary Oliver speaks of creative work:
It needs concentration, without interruptions. It needs the whole sky to fly in, and no eye watching until it comes to that certainty which it aspires to.1
Trying to quieten the watching process, the self-consciousness, which Oliver describes as
this intimate interrupter, can be the beginning of writing. Looking deeper, slowing the thinking, lengthening the shutter speed to allow more images to hit the retina. Hanging in time like my dog waiting for the ball to reach her jaws.
And listening. Listening while words rise, noting changes in my body. Do I feel the words or hear them? Do they feel right? If I speak them aloud, what do they tell me? Am I part of writing, or apart? Can I find that line and cross it? Can I loosen my own skin and stop holding so tight?
Mary Oliver, Upstream, (London: Random House, 2016) p. 23